D.P.P.-v- Owen Reid & Christopher Kirwan [2004] IECCA 3 (12 February 2004)
No prima facie case of affray against Owen Reid as there was no evidence of him using or threatening unlawful violence towards any person except Gardaí, and he was acquitted of assault. In Kirwan's case, jury directions misstated the evidential standard by requiring two views to be 'equal' rather than 'possible', rendering the conviction unsafe.
- Citation
- [2004] IECCA 3
- Parties
- Applicant: Owen Reid; Applicant: Christopher Kirwan; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, convictions quashed, no retrial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Affray, Assault, Jury Directions, Evidential Standards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Owen Reid
Applicant
Christopher Kirwan
Applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a prima facie case of affray against Owen Reid
- 2 Whether jury directions on evidential standards were correct in Christopher Kirwan's case
- 3 Consistency of affray conviction with acquittal on assault charges
Ratio Decidendi
No prima facie case of affray against Owen Reid as there was no evidence of him using or threatening unlawful violence towards any person except Gardaí, and he was acquitted of assault. In Kirwan's case, jury directions misstated the evidential standard by requiring two views to be 'equal' rather than 'possible', rendering the conviction unsafe.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, convictions quashed, no retrial ordered
Orders
- Convictions quashed
- No retrial directed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment