P.B. -v- A.B. [2012] IEHC 616 (24 May 2012)
Provision must be confined to accommodation, maintenance, and pension adjustment, avoiding redistribution of inherited or gifted family business assets, as basic needs are met and Supreme Court precedent mandates focus on statutory requirements rather than wealth redistribution.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 616
- Parties
- Applicant: P. B.; Respondent: A. B.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Separation / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judicial separation granted; provision made for accommodation, maintenance, and pension adjustment.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Separation, Ancillary Relief, Maintenance, Pension Adjustment, Property Division, Inherited Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. B.
Applicant
A. B.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Separation / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper provision for spouses on judicial separation
- 2 Treatment of inherited and gifted assets in family business
- 3 Maintenance and pension adjustment
Ratio Decidendi
Provision must be confined to accommodation, maintenance, and pension adjustment, avoiding redistribution of inherited or gifted family business assets, as basic needs are met and Supreme Court precedent mandates focus on statutory requirements rather than wealth redistribution.
Court Disposition
Judicial separation granted; provision made for accommodation, maintenance, and pension adjustment.
Orders
- Sale of family home for €950,000; €500,000 to wife, €340,000 to husband.
- Husband to pay wife €1,500 per month maintenance (including €400 for youngest daughter), net €1,100 after tax.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment