Moloney -v- White [2016] IEHC 44 (28 January 2016)

Moloney -v- White [2016] IEHC 44 (28 January 2016)

The defendant was found liable for the incident as his vehicle turned in and pinned the plaintiff against his jeep, causing injury. However, the plaintiff was found 25% contributorily negligent for provoking the situation by his actions. The court found no basis for dismissing the claim under Section 26, as the plaintiff did not intentionally mislead the court or his doctors regarding his pre-existing condition. Damages were awarded accordingly and reduced for contributory negligence.

Citation
[2016] IEHC 44
Parties
Plaintiff: P. J. Maloney; Defendant: Patrick White
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
28 January 2016
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Action / High Court Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff, with damages reduced for contributory negligence.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Personal Injuries, Disclosure Obligations, Section 26 Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004
Tort Law Personal Injury Negligence Contributory Negligence Personal Injuries Disclosure Obligations Section 26 Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P. J. Maloney

Plaintiff

Patrick White

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injuries Action / High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was liable for the plaintiff's injuries resulting from the incident involving the vehicles.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff's claim should be dismissed under Section 26 of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 for alleged false or misleading evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant was found liable for the incident as his vehicle turned in and pinned the plaintiff against his jeep, causing injury. However, the plaintiff was found 25% contributorily negligent for provoking the situation by his actions. The court found no basis for dismissing the claim under Section 26, as the plaintiff did not intentionally mislead the court or his doctors regarding his pre-existing condition. Damages were awarded accordingly and reduced for contributory negligence.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff, with damages reduced for contributory negligence.

Orders

  • Award of €65,000 for pain and suffering to date.
  • Award of €25,000 for pain and suffering into the future.