W. Y. -v- C. [2007] IEHC 400 (23 November 2007)
There was material non-disclosure by the applicant regarding the availability of remedies in Hong Kong, justifying the setting aside of leave. Upon reconsideration, Ireland is not the appropriate forum for ancillary relief as the parties' connections and available remedies point to Hong Kong as the proper venue.
- Citation
- [2007] IEHC 400
- Parties
- Applicant: P. W. Y; Respondent: P. C
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Application for Ancillary Relief After Foreign Divorce / High Court Judgment on Motion to Set Aside Leave and Application for Fresh Leave
- Outcome
- Application for leave set aside; fresh application for leave refused.
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Divorce, Ancillary Relief, Jurisdiction, Material Non Disclosure, Forum Non Conveniens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. W. Y
Applicant
P. C
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Application for Ancillary Relief After Foreign Divorce / High Court Judgment on Motion to Set Aside Leave and Application for Fresh Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to set aside leave granted ex parte under s.23(3) Family Law Act 1995
- 2 Whether material non-disclosure by the applicant justifies setting aside leave
- 3 Whether Ireland is the appropriate forum for ancillary relief under Part III Family Law Act 1995
Ratio Decidendi
There was material non-disclosure by the applicant regarding the availability of remedies in Hong Kong, justifying the setting aside of leave. Upon reconsideration, Ireland is not the appropriate forum for ancillary relief as the parties' connections and available remedies point to Hong Kong as the proper venue.
Court Disposition
Application for leave set aside; fresh application for leave refused.
Orders
- Order of 15 December 2005 granting leave to apply set aside.
- Application for leave to apply for relief under Part III Family Law Act 1995 refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment