Stapleford Finance Ltd (as substituted) -v- Lavelle [2016] IECA 104 (11 April 2016)
The assignment of loans constituted an event and a change of interest within the meaning of Order 17, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Superior Courts, permitting substitution of the respondent as plaintiff. The High Court had jurisdiction to make the order, and the appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 104
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Stapleford Finance Limited; Defendant/appellant: Peter Lavelle; Notice Party: Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited (in Special Liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Party Substitution, Assignment of Chose in Action, Interpretation of Procedural Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stapleford Finance Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Peter Lavelle
Defendant/appellant
Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited (in Special Liquidation)
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction under Order 17, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Superior Courts to substitute the respondent as plaintiff
- 2 Whether the assignment of loans constituted an 'event' and a 'change of interest' within the meaning of Order 17, Rule 4
Ratio Decidendi
The assignment of loans constituted an event and a change of interest within the meaning of Order 17, Rule 4 of the Rules of the Superior Courts, permitting substitution of the respondent as plaintiff. The High Court had jurisdiction to make the order, and the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Stapleford Finance Limited substituted as plaintiff in place of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Limited
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment