Re: Estate of Gillespie [2015] IEHC 462 (13 July 2015)
The respondent failed to raise sufficient factual dispute on affidavit to justify maintenance of the caveat; the evidence supports that the deceased executed the will in Glasgow on 28th December 2009, and any further challenge must be brought by plenary probate action, not by motion.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 462
- Parties
- Applicant: Patrick Joseph Boyle; Respondent/caveator: Annie O'Donnell; Deceased: Charles (Cathal) Gillespie
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Motion / Motion to Remove Caveat
- Outcome
- Caveat removed; grant of probate to issue to executor named in will of 28th December 2009, subject to any future plenary action.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Caveat, Validity of Will, Grant of Probate, Testamentary Capacity, Undue Influence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Joseph Boyle
Applicant
Annie O'Donnell
Respondent/caveator
Charles (Cathal) Gillespie
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Probate Motion / Motion to Remove Caveat
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the caveat lodged against the grant of probate should be removed
- 2 Whether the will dated 28th December 2009 was validly executed by the deceased
- 3 Whether suspicions regarding undue influence, duress, or testamentary capacity warrant further proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent failed to raise sufficient factual dispute on affidavit to justify maintenance of the caveat; the evidence supports that the deceased executed the will in Glasgow on 28th December 2009, and any further challenge must be brought by plenary probate action, not by motion.
Court Disposition
Caveat removed; grant of probate to issue to executor named in will of 28th December 2009, subject to any future plenary action.
Orders
- Order directing removal of caveat
- Grant of probate to issue to Patrick Joseph Boyle as executor
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment