Heidelstone Company Ltd -v- Trustees Act [2006] IEHC 408 (24 November 2006)

Heidelstone Company Ltd -v- Trustees Act [2006] IEHC 408 (24 November 2006)

The court held that both the vendor and management companies, at the time of their dissolution, held the relevant property on trust for the apartment and townhouse owners, and that the court had jurisdiction under s.26 of the Trustee Act 1893 to vest the property in the new management company for the benefit of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] IEHC 408
Parties
Vendor Company (first Company): Heidelstone Company Limited; Management Company (second Company): Courtview Management Limited; Applicant: Paul Boothman; Applicant: Pauline Boothman; Applicant: Mary Goggins; Applicant: Philip Donnelly; Applicant: Esther Walsh; Applicant: Anne Walsh; Applicant: Valerie Byrne; Applicant: John Cashman; Applicant: Aileen Forbes Byrne; Applicant: Herbert Darlington; Applicant: Raymond Freeley; New Management Company (applicant): Courtview Management (No. 2) Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
24 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trustee Act 1893 / Judgment on Application for Vesting Order
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Vesting Order, Dissolution of Companies, Apartment and Townhouse Management Schemes, Trustee Appointment, Beneficial Ownership, State Property Act 1954
Property Law Trusts and Equity Company Law Vesting Order Dissolution of Companies Apartment and Townhouse Management Schemes Trustee Appointment Beneficial Ownership +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Heidelstone Company Limited

Vendor Company (first Company)

Courtview Management Limited

Management Company (second Company)

Paul Boothman

Applicant

Pauline Boothman

Applicant

Mary Goggins

Applicant

Philip Donnelly

Applicant

Esther Walsh

Applicant

Anne Walsh

Applicant

Valerie Byrne

Applicant

John Cashman

Applicant

Aileen Forbes Byrne

Applicant

Herbert Darlington

Applicant

Raymond Freeley

Applicant

Courtview Management (No. 2) Limited

New Management Company (applicant)

Procedural Posture

Application Under Trustee Act 1893 / Judgment on Application for Vesting Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can make a vesting order under s.26 of the Trustee Act 1893 vesting property formerly held by dissolved companies in a new management company for the benefit of apartment and townhouse owners.
  2. 2 Whether the dissolved vendor and management companies held the property on trust for the applicants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that both the vendor and management companies, at the time of their dissolution, held the relevant property on trust for the apartment and townhouse owners, and that the court had jurisdiction under s.26 of the Trustee Act 1893 to vest the property in the new management company for the benefit of those owners, subject to existing leases and easements.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Order vesting the Varied Estate (No. 52 Castle Avenue and adjoining land) in Courtview Management (No. 2) Limited in fee simple and for all other estate, right, title and interest as the First Company and Second Company had at dissolution, subject to leases of apartments in No. 52 and to easements, rights and...
  • Order not to be perfected until non-participating house owners are notified and given opportunity to object, and until affidavit of notification to Mr. McKone is filed.