Casey v McMenamin (Approved) [2024] IEHC 705 (04 December 2024)

Casey v McMenamin (Approved) [2024] IEHC 705 (04 December 2024)

The Facebook post was untrue, defamatory, and published widely. The defendant failed to remove the post despite court orders and did not defend the proceedings. The plaintiff's reputation was harmed, justifying substantial compensatory and aggravated damages.

Citation
[2024] IEHC 705
Parties
Applicant: Peter Casey; Respondent: Kim McMenamin
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
04 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Assessment of Damages Following Judgment in Default of Appearance
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics
Defamation, Aggravated Damages, Punitive Damages, Social Media Liability
Tort Law Media Law Defamation Aggravated Damages Punitive Damages Social Media Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Casey

Applicant

Kim McMenamin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Defamation / Assessment of Damages Following Judgment in Default of Appearance

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Facebook post was defamatory of the plaintiff
  2. 2 Whether the statements were true or false
  3. 3 Assessment of damages including aggravated and punitive damages

Ratio Decidendi

The Facebook post was untrue, defamatory, and published widely. The defendant failed to remove the post despite court orders and did not defend the proceedings. The plaintiff's reputation was harmed, justifying substantial compensatory and aggravated damages.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • Award of €120,000 in general damages for defamation
  • Award of €20,000 in aggravated damages