McCourt v. Dan Dooley Ltd. [2001] IEHC 123 (25th June, 2001)
The plaintiff suffered significant injuries as a result of the defendant's admitted negligence, resulting in ongoing pain, disability, and the prospect of future surgery. The court preferred the evidence of the treating surgeon over the defence expert and awarded damages accordingly.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] IEHC 123
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Peter McCourt; Defendant: [Defendant not named]
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Claim / Assessment of Damages After Admission of Liability
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Road Traffic Accident, Compensation for Pain and Suffering, Future Medical Expenses
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter McCourt
Plaintiff
[Defendant not named]
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Assessment of Damages After Admission of Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Quantum of damages for personal injuries sustained in a road traffic accident
- 2 Extent of ongoing and future disability and pain
- 3 Appropriate compensation for past and future suffering and medical needs
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff suffered significant injuries as a result of the defendant's admitted negligence, resulting in ongoing pain, disability, and the prospect of future surgery. The court preferred the evidence of the treating surgeon over the defence expert and awarded damages accordingly.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded £67,225 in total damages (including £15,000 for past general damages, £50,000 for future general damages, and £2,225 special damages) and his costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment