M. (M.F.) v. W. (P.) [2001] IEHC 122 (22nd June, 2001)
Solicitor's notes of evidence and proceedings are not privileged as they are a record of what was public in court, but any part of the notes containing material designed to assist the plaintiff in the prosecution of the action is privileged and should be covered up before inspection.
- Citation
- [2001] IEHC 122
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Notice Party: Notice Party
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Discovery and Privilege
- Outcome
- Partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Legal Professional Privilege, Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Notice Party
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Discovery and Privilege
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether solicitor's notes of evidence and proceedings are covered by legal professional privilege in the same action
- 2 Extent to which such notes are discoverable
Ratio Decidendi
Solicitor's notes of evidence and proceedings are not privileged as they are a record of what was public in court, but any part of the notes containing material designed to assist the plaintiff in the prosecution of the action is privileged and should be covered up before inspection.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed
Orders
- Solicitor's notes of evidence and proceedings are not privileged and must be produced for inspection, except for portions containing material designed to assist the plaintiff in the prosecution of the action, which are privileged and may be covered up.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment