Connolly v. Casey [1999] IESC 76; [2000] 1 IR 345; [2000] 2 ILRM 226 (17th November, 1999)

Connolly v. Casey [1999] IESC 76; [2000] 1 IR 345; [2000] 2 ILRM 226 (17th November, 1999)

The delay in serving the third party notice was not unreasonable given the need to await replies to particulars and a statement from the instructing solicitor; therefore, the notice was served as soon as reasonably possible under Section 27(1)(b) of the Civil Liability Act, 1961.

Citation
[1999] IESC 76
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff (unnamed); Defendant: Defendants (solicitors, unnamed); Third Party: Michael Fitzgibbon (barrister)
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Setting Aside Third Party Proceedings
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Third Party Proceedings, Service of Notice, Reasonable Delay, Contribution Claims
Civil Procedure Professional Negligence Third Party Proceedings Service of Notice Reasonable Delay Contribution Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff (unnamed)

Plaintiff

Defendants (solicitors, unnamed)

Defendant

Michael Fitzgibbon (barrister)

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Setting Aside Third Party Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the third party notice was served as soon as is reasonably possible under Section 27(1)(b) of the Civil Liability Act, 1961
  2. 2 Whether delays in serving the third party notice were reasonable

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in serving the third party notice was not unreasonable given the need to await replies to particulars and a statement from the instructing solicitor; therefore, the notice was served as soon as reasonably possible under Section 27(1)(b) of the Civil Liability Act, 1961.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Order of the High Court setting aside the third party notice is reversed
  • Third party proceedings reinstated