Prins v. Sligo Corporation [2000] IEHC 114 (2nd May, 2000)
Section 10 of the Heritage Act, 1995 applies only to heritage buildings designated by the Minister under Section 10(4), not to all buildings meeting the definition in Section 2.
- Citation
- [2000] IEHC 114
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Judgment on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Plaintiff not entitled to relief
- Legal Topics
- Heritage Protection, Statutory Interpretation, Public Authority Property Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Judgment on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Heritage Act, 1995 Section 10 apply to all heritage buildings or only those designated by Minister?
- 2 Is the Defendant obliged to comply with Section 10 before demolishing the buildings?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10 of the Heritage Act, 1995 applies only to heritage buildings designated by the Minister under Section 10(4), not to all buildings meeting the definition in Section 2.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff not entitled to relief
Orders
- Application for interlocutory injunction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment