Clarke v. Kilternan Motor Company Ltd. [1996] IEHC 39 (10th December, 1996)

Clarke v. Kilternan Motor Company Ltd. [1996] IEHC 39 (10th December, 1996)

The agreement was terminated by the Plaintiff, not the Defendants. The Plaintiff's operation of a separate bank account and retention of monies constituted a fundamental breach, which would have justified immediate termination by the Defendants without notice. Therefore, the Plaintiff was not entitled to reasonable notice.

Citation
[1996] IEHC 39
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendants
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Civil / High Court Judgment
Outcome
Decree for the Plaintiff for £5,653 plus interest from 31st March, 1993.
Legal Topics
Termination of Contract, Implied Terms, Breach of Contract, Notice of Termination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Defendants

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the agreement was wrongfully terminated by the Defendants
  2. 2 Whether reasonable notice was required to terminate the agreement
  3. 3 Whether there was a fundamental breach justifying termination without notice

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement was terminated by the Plaintiff, not the Defendants. The Plaintiff's operation of a separate bank account and retention of monies constituted a fundamental breach, which would have justified immediate termination by the Defendants without notice. Therefore, the Plaintiff was not entitled to reasonable notice.

Court Disposition

Decree for the Plaintiff for £5,653 plus interest from 31st March, 1993.

Orders

  • Decree for £5,653 in favour of the Plaintiff
  • Interest pursuant to the Courts Act from 31st March, 1993