Clarke v. Kilternan Motor Company Ltd. [1996] IEHC 39 (10th December, 1996)
The agreement was terminated by the Plaintiff, not the Defendants. The Plaintiff's operation of a separate bank account and retention of monies constituted a fundamental breach, which would have justified immediate termination by the Defendants without notice. Therefore, the Plaintiff was not entitled to reasonable notice.
- Citation
- [1996] IEHC 39
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendants
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Decree for the Plaintiff for £5,653 plus interest from 31st March, 1993.
- Legal Topics
- Termination of Contract, Implied Terms, Breach of Contract, Notice of Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendants
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the agreement was wrongfully terminated by the Defendants
- 2 Whether reasonable notice was required to terminate the agreement
- 3 Whether there was a fundamental breach justifying termination without notice
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement was terminated by the Plaintiff, not the Defendants. The Plaintiff's operation of a separate bank account and retention of monies constituted a fundamental breach, which would have justified immediate termination by the Defendants without notice. Therefore, the Plaintiff was not entitled to reasonable notice.
Court Disposition
Decree for the Plaintiff for £5,653 plus interest from 31st March, 1993.
Orders
- Decree for £5,653 in favour of the Plaintiff
- Interest pursuant to the Courts Act from 31st March, 1993
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment