McGuiness v. Motor Distributors Ltd. [1996] IEHC 26; [1997] 2 IR 171 (22nd October, 1996)
The Plaintiff was a party to the prior proceedings, not merely his insurance company, and the issues and parties are identical; therefore, estoppel applies.
- Citation
- [1997] 2 IR 171
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendants
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- plea of estoppel allowed
- Legal Topics
- Estoppel, Privity of Interest, Breach of Contract, Motor Vehicle Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendants
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiff is estopped from proceeding with the action due to prior determination of the same issue
- 2 Whether privity of interest exists between the Plaintiff and his insurance company in prior proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff was a party to the prior proceedings, not merely his insurance company, and the issues and parties are identical; therefore, estoppel applies.
Court Disposition
plea of estoppel allowed
Orders
- Plaintiff is estopped from proceeding with the action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment