Telenor Invest A.S. v. I.I.U. Nominees Ltd. [1999] IEHC 188 (20th July, 1999)

Court has jurisdiction to grant interlocutory relief pending arbitration; balance of convenience favours restraining first Defendant's nominees from acting as directors pending resolution of Clause 7.4 dispute.

Citation: [1999] IEHC 188
Parties: Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: First Defendant; Defendant: Second Defendant
Jurisdiction: Ireland
Procedural Posture: Interlocutory Application / Motion for Stay and Interlocutory Injunction
Outcome: Interlocutory injunction granted; stay of proceedings in relation to Clause 7.4 dispute.
Legal Topics: Shareholding Agreement, Director Nomination, Arbitration Clause, Interlocutory Relief, Balance of Convenience

Company Law Arbitration Law Shareholding Agreement Director Nomination Arbitration Clause Interlocutory Relief Balance of Convenience

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Plaintiff

First Defendant

Defendant

Second Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Motion for Stay and Interlocutory Injunction

Legal Issues

1 Interpretation of Clause 7.4 regarding director nomination rights
2 Jurisdiction of court to grant interim relief pending arbitration
3 Whether ancillary claims (estoppel, collateral agreement) are subject to arbitration

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Interlocutory injunction granted; stay of proceedings in relation to Clause 7.4 dispute.

Orders

Interlocutory injunction restraining first Defendant from permitting its director nominees to act pending determination of Clause 7.4 dispute.
Stay of Plaintiff's proceedings in so far as they relate to Clause 7.4 dispute.