Fagan v. Burgess [1998] IEHC 52; [1999] 3 IR 306 (25th March, 1998)
Absolute privilege applies to witnesses in judicial proceedings, including cases of perjury, and no civil action can be brought against them for evidence given in court.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] IEHC 52
- Parties
- Defendant: Mr. Burgess; Plaintiff: Plaintiff/Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Motion to Strike Out Proceedings / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Proceedings struck out
- Legal Topics
- Absolute Privilege, Perjury, Immunity of Witnesses, Striking Out Proceedings
Tort Law Civil Procedure Absolute Privilege Perjury Immunity of Witnesses Striking Out Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr. Burgess
Defendant
Plaintiff/Respondent
Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Motion to Strike Out Proceedings / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a witness in a civil action can be sued for perjury
- 2 Whether absolute privilege applies to perjury in civil proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Absolute privilege applies to witnesses in judicial proceedings, including cases of perjury, and no civil action can be brought against them for evidence given in court.
Court Disposition
Proceedings struck out
Orders
- Plaintiff's motion allowed
- Proceedings struck out as disclosing no reasonable cause of action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment