Dawson v. Irish Brokers Association [2002] IESC 36 (8 May 2002)
Lay litigants are not entitled to recover costs for preparatory work at the same rate as solicitors, nor can they recover fees for advice from solicitors not on record, as only legal costs measurable by the court are recoverable and the law has not been altered by statute.
- Citation
- [2002] IESC 36
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiffs (insurance brokers); Defendant: Defendants
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order on Review of Taxation of Costs
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs Recovery, Lay Litigants, Taxation of Costs, Solicitor's Fees, Constitutional Right of Access to Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs (insurance brokers)
Plaintiff
Defendants
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order on Review of Taxation of Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether lay litigants are entitled to recover costs for preparatory work at the same rate as solicitors
- 2 Whether lay litigants can recover fees for advice from solicitors not on record
Ratio Decidendi
Lay litigants are not entitled to recover costs for preparatory work at the same rate as solicitors, nor can they recover fees for advice from solicitors not on record, as only legal costs measurable by the court are recoverable and the law has not been altered by statute.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of the High Court affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment