Doran v. Delaney (No.2) [1998] IEHC 166; [1999] 1 IR 303; [1999] 1 ILRM 225 (25th November, 1998)
The vendors and their solicitors were liable for negligent misrepresentation and breach of duty in failing to disclose a known boundary dispute and providing misleading replies to requisitions on title. The plaintiffs' losses, including those arising from their inability to mitigate due to impecuniosity, were reasonably foreseeable and recoverable. The appropriate measure of damages was the sum required to place the plaintiffs in the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed, including the cost of acquiring a comparable home, builder's debt, and related expenses.
- Citation
- [1999] 1 ILRM 225
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiffs (Mr. and Mrs. Doran); Defendant Plaintiffs' Solicitor: Michael J. Delaney; Defendant Vendor: Martin Greene; Defendant Vendor: Elizabeth Greene; Defendant Vendors' Solicitor: Joseph F. Maguire; Defendant Vendors' Solicitor: Della Power
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Damages for Defective Title in Property Sale / High Court Judgment Following Supreme Court Appeal on Liability; Damages Assessment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Plaintiffs against the vendors, their solicitors, and the Plaintiffs' own solicitor; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Defective Title, Negligent Misrepresentation, Duty of Care, Measure of Damages, Remoteness of Damage, Mitigation of Loss, Vendor and Purchaser, Solicitor's Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs (Mr. and Mrs. Doran)
Plaintiff
Michael J. Delaney
Defendant Plaintiffs' Solicitor
Martin Greene
Defendant Vendor
Elizabeth Greene
Defendant Vendor
Joseph F. Maguire
Defendant Vendors' Solicitor
Della Power
Defendant Vendors' Solicitor
Procedural Posture
Civil Damages for Defective Title in Property Sale / High Court Judgment Following Supreme Court Appeal on Liability; Damages Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the vendors and their solicitors were liable for negligent misrepresentation and breach of duty regarding defective title
- 2 Whether the plaintiffs' losses, including those arising from impecuniosity, were recoverable
- 3 Appropriate measure of damages for loss arising from inability to build on purchased site
Ratio Decidendi
The vendors and their solicitors were liable for negligent misrepresentation and breach of duty in failing to disclose a known boundary dispute and providing misleading replies to requisitions on title. The plaintiffs' losses, including those arising from their inability to mitigate due to impecuniosity, were reasonably foreseeable and recoverable. The appropriate measure of damages was the sum required to place the plaintiffs in the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed, including the cost of acquiring a comparable home, builder's debt, and related expenses.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Plaintiffs against the vendors, their solicitors, and the Plaintiffs' own solicitor; damages awarded.
Orders
- Special damages of £192,198.56 awarded to Plaintiffs
- General damages of £10,000 awarded to Plaintiffs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment