Jackson Way Properties Ltd. v. Minister for the Environment and Local Government [1999] IEHC 28; [1999] 4 IR 608 (10th September, 1999)

Jackson Way Properties Ltd. v. Minister for the Environment and Local Government [1999] IEHC 28; [1999] 4 IR 608 (10th September, 1999)

The court found that the plaintiff's entire adult life had been devastated by Hepatitis C, with symptoms worsening and a bleak prognosis, justifying an increase in general damages to £250,000. The court held that the total award of £400,000, including financial losses, was not inappropriate given the severity and duration of the plaintiff's suffering.

Citation
[1999] IEHC 28
Parties
Plaintiff: [Plaintiff's Name Not Provided]; Respondent: Hepatitis C Compensation Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; general damages increased.
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, General Damages, Hepatitis C Compensation, Assessment of Damages
Tort Law Medical Negligence Compensation Law Personal Injury General Damages Hepatitis C Compensation Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[Plaintiff's Name Not Provided]

Plaintiff

Hepatitis C Compensation Tribunal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the general damages awarded to the plaintiff by the Tribunal were adequate to compensate for pain and suffering caused by Hepatitis C infection.
  2. 2 Appropriate assessment of general damages for past and future suffering.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff's entire adult life had been devastated by Hepatitis C, with symptoms worsening and a bleak prognosis, justifying an increase in general damages to £250,000. The court held that the total award of £400,000, including financial losses, was not inappropriate given the severity and duration of the plaintiff's suffering.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; general damages increased.

Orders

  • General damages increased to £250,000.
  • Judgment for the plaintiff for £120,000 (being the additional sum over what was already paid by the Tribunal).