Haughey v. Moriarty [1998] IESC 17 (28th July, 1998)
The Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act, 1921 as amended is not inconsistent with the Constitution. Tribunals established under the Act do not administer justice within the meaning of Article 34.1, as they do not determine legal rights or impose penalties but merely conduct inquiries and report findings. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] IESC 17
- Parties
- Appellant: Plaintiffs/Appellants; Respondent: Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Challenge / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as to the constitutional challenge; declaration that the 1921 Act as amended is not inconsistent with the Constitution and continues in force.
- Legal Topics
- Tribunals of Inquiry, Separation of Powers, Presumption of Constitutionality, Administration of Justice, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs/Appellants
Appellant
Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Challenge / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act, 1921 as amended is invalid having regard to the Constitution
- 2 Whether the Oireachtas has jurisdiction to resolve that a tribunal be established for urgent public matters
- 3 Whether the Taoiseach or Minister has power to appoint such a tribunal
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act, 1921 as amended is not inconsistent with the Constitution. Tribunals established under the Act do not administer justice within the meaning of Article 34.1, as they do not determine legal rights or impose penalties but merely conduct inquiries and report findings. The Oireachtas and Government have inherent constitutional authority to establish such inquiries. The 1921 Act, save where amended, continues in force under Article 50 of the Constitution. The challenge to the Act's constitutionality fails.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as to the constitutional challenge; declaration that the 1921 Act as amended is not inconsistent with the Constitution and continues in force.
Orders
- Declaration that the Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act, 1921 as amended is not inconsistent with the Constitution and continues in force under Article 50.
- Declaration that the Oireachtas and Government have inherent power to establish tribunals of inquiry for matters of urgent public importance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment