An Post/ Standard Postal Franking Machine Licence Agreement [2001] IECA 585 (20th March, 2001)
The licence agreement does not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition and does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [2001] IECA 585
- Parties
- Notifier: An Post; Decision Maker: Competition Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Notification / Final Decision
- Outcome
- certificate issued; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1)
- Legal Topics
- Postal Services, Licensing Agreements, Statutory Monopoly, Maintenance Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Parties
An Post
Notifier
Competition Authority
Decision Maker
Procedural Posture
Competition Notification / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the standard postal franking machine licence agreement contravenes Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
Ratio Decidendi
The licence agreement does not have as its object or effect the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition and does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate issued; agreement does not contravene Section 4(1)
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the standard agreement between An Post and its customers relating to the licence by An Post of postal franking machines for denoting prepayment of postage does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment