Print and Display Ltd v Dowdall (Approved) [2020] IEHC 366 (24 July 2020)
Application to remove liquidator was refused; costs follow the event as applicant failed to demonstrate grounds for departure from general rule; costs of cross-examination motion are costs in the cause; stay on execution of costs granted pending appeal due to complexity and substantial legal issues.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 366
- Parties
- Applicant: Print and Display Limited; Respondent: Liam Dowdall; Notice Party: Michael Curneen
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Company Law Application / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Liquidator, Costs, Stay of Execution
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Print and Display Limited
Applicant
Liam Dowdall
Respondent
Michael Curneen
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Company Law Application / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should follow the event after refusal of application to remove liquidator
- 2 Whether a stay should be placed on execution of costs pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Application to remove liquidator was refused; costs follow the event as applicant failed to demonstrate grounds for departure from general rule; costs of cross-examination motion are costs in the cause; stay on execution of costs granted pending appeal due to complexity and substantial legal issues.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Order dismissing the application
- Order for costs in favour of respondent, including reserved costs, to be adjudicated if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment