Promontoria (Aran) Ltd v Burns, Promontoria (Aran) Ltd v Burns (Unapproved) [2020] IECA 87 (07 April 2020)

Promontoria (Aran) Ltd v Burns, Promontoria (Aran) Ltd v Burns (Unapproved) [2020] IECA 87 (07 April 2020)

The evidence provided by Promontoria, as an assignee and non-bank, was insufficient to meet the requirements for summary judgment under Order 37 due to evidentiary limitations, particularly the inability to swear positively to matters predating the assignment and the inadmissibility of business records under the hearsay rule.

Citation
[2020] IECA 87
Parties
Appellant: Promontoria (Aran) Limited; Defendant: Gerry Burns; Defendant: Anne Burns
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
07 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Assignment of Debt, Hearsay Rule, Business Records Admissibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Promontoria (Aran) Limited

Appellant

Gerry Burns

Defendant

Anne Burns

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the evidence adduced by Promontoria was sufficient to grant summary judgment
  2. 2 Whether the requirements of Order 37 of the Rules of the Superior Courts were met by an assignee not being a bank
  3. 3 Admissibility of business records in civil proceedings for summary judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence provided by Promontoria, as an assignee and non-bank, was insufficient to meet the requirements for summary judgment under Order 37 due to evidentiary limitations, particularly the inability to swear positively to matters predating the assignment and the inadmissibility of business records under the hearsay rule.

Court Disposition

appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals by Promontoria (Aran) Limited dismissed.