Hosford v The Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection (Approved) [2024] IECA 294 (04 December 2024)
Section 13(2) of the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 imposes a clear statutory bar on pursuing a tort claim where a complaint has already been made or presented to the WRC in respect of the same matter, regardless of whether the WRC complaint was dismissed as statute barred or not adjudicated on its merits. The election is binding and not conditional on the outcome of the WRC process.
- Citation
- [2024] IECA 294
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Pascal Hosford; Defendant/appellant: Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Protected Disclosures, Statutory Tort, Strike Out Applications, Limitation Periods, Election of Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pascal Hosford
Plaintiff/respondent
Minister for Employment Affairs and Social Protection
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.13(2) of the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 bars a tort claim where a prior WRC complaint was dismissed as statute barred
- 2 Whether the absence of a substantive WRC determination affects the statutory bar on alternative remedies
Ratio Decidendi
Section 13(2) of the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 imposes a clear statutory bar on pursuing a tort claim where a complaint has already been made or presented to the WRC in respect of the same matter, regardless of whether the WRC complaint was dismissed as statute barred or not adjudicated on its merits. The election is binding and not conditional on the outcome of the WRC process.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; proceedings dismissed
Orders
- Order of the High Court set aside
- Mr. Hosford's proceedings dismissed as bound to fail under Order 19, Rule 28
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment