D.P.P.-v- Raymond Casey & Anthony Casey [2004] IECCA 49 (14 December 2004)

D.P.P.-v- Raymond Casey & Anthony Casey [2004] IECCA 49 (14 December 2004)

The trial judge did not err in refusing to compel the prosecution to call Dean Casey, as the prosecution's discretion was properly exercised and the defence was given full opportunity to call the witness. The fingerprint and palm print evidence was lawfully obtained under statutory authority. The statements of both appellants were properly admitted, with any technical breaches not affecting the substance of their rights. The trial judge's charge to the jury on manslaughter and joint enterprise was adequate. No miscarriage of justice occurred.

Citation
[2004] IECCA 49
Parties
Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions; Appellant: Raymond Casey; Appellant: Anthony Casey
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
14 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction, Treated as Substantive Appeal
Outcome
appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Admissibility of Evidence, Witnesses, Fair Trial, Judge's Rules, Custody Regulations, Joint Enterprise, Manslaughter, Fingerprint Evidence
Criminal Law Murder Admissibility of Evidence Witnesses Fair Trial Judge's Rules Custody Regulations Joint Enterprise +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Prosecutor

Raymond Casey

Appellant

Anthony Casey

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction, Treated as Substantive Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to order the prosecution to call or tender Dean Casey as a witness
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting fingerprint and palm print evidence
  3. 3 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting statements and interviews of the appellants

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge did not err in refusing to compel the prosecution to call Dean Casey, as the prosecution's discretion was properly exercised and the defence was given full opportunity to call the witness. The fingerprint and palm print evidence was lawfully obtained under statutory authority. The statements of both appellants were properly admitted, with any technical breaches not affecting the substance of their rights. The trial judge's charge to the jury on manslaughter and joint enterprise was adequate. No miscarriage of justice occurred.

Court Disposition

appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals of both Raymond Casey and Anthony Casey dismissed.