Symantec Ltd -v- Leddy [2009] IEHC 256 (28 May 2009)
Employees who object to the transfer of their employment under Regulation 4(1) of the European Communities (Protection of Employees on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 2003 are not entitled to redundancy payments from the transferor employer under the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967–2007, as Irish law does not provide for such entitlement in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [2009] IEHC 256
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Symantec Limited; Defendant/respondent: Declan Leddy; Defendant/respondent: Diarmuid Lyons
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Statutory Appeal / High Court Appeal From Employment Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Transfer of Undertakings, Employee Rights, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Symantec Limited
Plaintiff/appellant
Declan Leddy
Defendant/respondent
Diarmuid Lyons
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Statutory Appeal / High Court Appeal From Employment Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether employees who object to transfer of employment under the European Communities (Protection of Employees on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 2003 are entitled to redundancy payments from the transferor employer under the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967–2007.
Ratio Decidendi
Employees who object to the transfer of their employment under Regulation 4(1) of the European Communities (Protection of Employees on Transfer of Undertakings) Regulations 2003 are not entitled to redundancy payments from the transferor employer under the Redundancy Payments Acts 1967–2007, as Irish law does not provide for such entitlement in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Determinations of the Employment Appeals Tribunal set aside
- Redundancy claims of the defendants/respondents against the plaintiff/appellant dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment