Release Speech Therapy Ltd -v- H. S. E. [2011] IEHC 57 (18 February 2011)
A reasonably well-informed and normally diligent tenderer would have understood that both group and individual therapy were required; no breach of transparency occurred; applicant's inflexibility rendered it unqualified; no obligation to disclose weighting criteria in advance; certiorari relief is refused as applicant is not entitled to any remedy.
- Citation
- [2011] IEHC 57
- Parties
- Applicant: Release Speech Therapy Limited; Respondent: Health Service Executive
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Relief refused
- Legal Topics
- Tender Process Transparency, Award Criteria Disclosure, Framework Agreements, Annex II B Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Release Speech Therapy Limited
Applicant
Health Service Executive
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tender documentation breached transparency requirements by failing to disclose exclusion of group therapy only providers
- 2 Whether failure to disclose weighting and sub-thresholds for award criteria breached transparency
- 3 Whether certiorari is an appropriate remedy
Ratio Decidendi
A reasonably well-informed and normally diligent tenderer would have understood that both group and individual therapy were required; no breach of transparency occurred; applicant's inflexibility rendered it unqualified; no obligation to disclose weighting criteria in advance; certiorari relief is refused as applicant is not entitled to any remedy.
Court Disposition
Relief refused
Orders
- Application for certiorari refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment