Gael Linn v. Attorney General [1999] IESC 42 (18th May, 1999)

Gael Linn v. Attorney General [1999] IESC 42 (18th May, 1999)

The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of res judicata does not prevent the rating authority or Commissioner from reopening the question of exemption from rates for the applicant's properties in subsequent years, as each year's liability is a separate matter. The statutory power to review or revise valuations under section 3(1) of the Valuation Act 1988 is not restricted by previous court decisions, and the applicant's arguments based on constitutional status of the Irish language and fairness do not override the clear statutory language.

Citation
[1999] IESC 42
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Gael Linn; First Respondent: The Commissioner of Valuation; Third Respondent: The Rating Authority (The Council)
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Rating Exemption, Valuation of Property, Public Purpose Exemption, Annual Tax Liability
Administrative Law Tax Law Property Law Res Judicata Rating Exemption Valuation of Property Public Purpose Exemption Annual Tax Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gael Linn

Applicant/appellant

The Commissioner of Valuation

First Respondent

The Rating Authority (The Council)

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the doctrine of res judicata prevents the rating authority or Commissioner from reopening the question of exemption from rates for the applicant's properties under the Valuation Acts
  2. 2 Whether a previous court decision on exemption status precludes subsequent review or revision under statutory powers

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of res judicata does not prevent the rating authority or Commissioner from reopening the question of exemption from rates for the applicant's properties in subsequent years, as each year's liability is a separate matter. The statutory power to review or revise valuations under section 3(1) of the Valuation Act 1988 is not restricted by previous court decisions, and the applicant's arguments based on constitutional status of the Irish language and fairness do not override the clear statutory language.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.