H. (J.W.) v. W. (G.) [1998] IEHC 33 (25th February, 1998)

H. (J.W.) v. W. (G.) [1998] IEHC 33 (25th February, 1998)

The evidence did not establish that either party lacked the requisite capacity to enter into and sustain a normal marital relationship, nor that the Petitioner's consent was not full, free, and informed. Emotional immaturity and external influences were present but not to the degree required to invalidate the marriage.

Citation
[1998] IEHC 33
Parties
Petitioner: Petitioner; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Nullity Petition / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Petition refused
Legal Topics
Nullity of Marriage, Consent, Capacity to Marry, Emotional Maturity
Family Law Nullity of Marriage Consent Capacity to Marry Emotional Maturity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Nullity Petition / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Petitioner gave full, free and informed consent to the marriage
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent gave full, free and informed consent to the marriage
  3. 3 Whether the Respondent lacked capacity to enter into and sustain a normal marital relationship at the time of marriage

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not establish that either party lacked the requisite capacity to enter into and sustain a normal marital relationship, nor that the Petitioner's consent was not full, free, and informed. Emotional immaturity and external influences were present but not to the degree required to invalidate the marriage.

Court Disposition

Petition refused