B. (D.), Orse O'R. v. O'R. (N.) [1988] IEHC 24 (29 July 1988)
The court found no evidence of duress or undue influence by any person, including Sister Ligouri, and held that the petitioner's consent was a true consent, thus refusing the petition for nullity.
- Citation
- [1988] IEHC 24
- Parties
- Petitioner: Petitioner; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Nullity Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition refused
- Legal Topics
- Marriage Validity, Duress, Undue Influence, Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Petitioner
Petitioner
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Nullity Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner's consent to marriage was vitiated by duress or undue influence from another person
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no evidence of duress or undue influence by any person, including Sister Ligouri, and held that the petitioner's consent was a true consent, thus refusing the petition for nullity.
Court Disposition
petition refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment