Riordan v. An Taoiseach (No.1) [1997] IEHC 228; [1999] 4 IR 321 (14th November, 1997)
The High Court has no jurisdiction to review constitutional amendments approved by referendum and promulgated by the President. The plaintiff lacked locus standi to challenge government appointments and administrative acts, and several claims were moot due to the expiration of the relevant government actions.
- Citation
- [1999] 4 IR 321
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Riordan; Defendant: An Taoiseach; Defendant: An Tanaiste; Defendant: the Government of Ireland; Defendant: the Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Challenge / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- all claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constitutional Amendment, Judicial Review, Locus Standi, Appointment of Public Officials, Dissolution of Marriage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Riordan
Plaintiff
An Taoiseach
Defendant
An Tanaiste
Defendant
the Government of Ireland
Defendant
the Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Challenge / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review constitutional amendments approved by referendum
- 2 Validity of the Family Law (Divorce) Act 1996
- 3 Constitutionality of appointments to government and commissions
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court has no jurisdiction to review constitutional amendments approved by referendum and promulgated by the President. The plaintiff lacked locus standi to challenge government appointments and administrative acts, and several claims were moot due to the expiration of the relevant government actions.
Court Disposition
all claims dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment