Mughal v Sher [2015] IEHC 675 (27 October 2015)

Mughal v Sher [2015] IEHC 675 (27 October 2015)

The plaintiff is entitled to a 46.4% share of practice income based on agreed shift allocation, damages for loss of earnings due to wrongful exclusion, and declaratory/injunctive relief to protect his partnership interest in HSE payments.

Citation
[2015] IEHC 675
Parties
Plaintiff: Rizwan Aslam Mughal; Defendant: Nadir Sher
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
27 October 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for plaintiff
Legal Topics
Partnership Disputes, Profit Apportionment, Damages for Loss of Earnings, Injunctions, Declaratory Relief
Partnership Law Contract Law Medical Law Partnership Disputes Profit Apportionment Damages for Loss of Earnings Injunctions Declaratory Relief

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rizwan Aslam Mughal

Plaintiff

Nadir Sher

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Existence and terms of partnership
  2. 2 Apportionment of practice income
  3. 3 Entitlement to damages for loss of earnings

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff is entitled to a 46.4% share of practice income based on agreed shift allocation, damages for loss of earnings due to wrongful exclusion, and declaratory/injunctive relief to protect his partnership interest in HSE payments.

Court Disposition

Judgment for plaintiff

Orders

  • Plaintiff awarded €7,943 for loss of locum profits.
  • Plaintiff awarded €140,872.72 for unpaid HSE payments.