A.G. v. Burns [2003] IEHC 153 (10 December 2003)

A.G. v. Burns [2003] IEHC 153 (10 December 2003)

The District Court judge was correct in law to conclude that the statutory requirements for extradition were satisfied, including authentication of documents, dual criminality, absence of revenue offences, no pending prosecution in Ireland, compliance with limitation periods, observance of the rule of specialty, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] IEHC 153
Parties
Respondent: The Attorney General; Appellant: Robert Burns
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
10 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (extradition Appeal) / Appeal by Way of Case Stated From District Court Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; District Court determination affirmed.
Legal Topics
Dual Criminality, Rule of Specialty, Revenue Offences, Statutory Interpretation, Correspondence of Offences, Statute of Limitations, Evidentiary Requirements for Extradition
Extradition Law Criminal Law International Law Dual Criminality Rule of Specialty Revenue Offences Statutory Interpretation Correspondence of Offences +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Attorney General

Respondent

Robert Burns

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review (extradition Appeal) / Appeal by Way of Case Stated From District Court Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the documentation supporting the extradition request satisfied statutory requirements under s.37 of the Extradition Act 1965
  2. 2 Whether the offences for which extradition was sought satisfied dual criminality
  3. 3 Whether any offences constituted revenue offences under s.3 of the Extradition Act 1965

Ratio Decidendi

The District Court judge was correct in law to conclude that the statutory requirements for extradition were satisfied, including authentication of documents, dual criminality, absence of revenue offences, no pending prosecution in Ireland, compliance with limitation periods, observance of the rule of specialty, and sufficient specification and correspondence of offences.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; District Court determination affirmed.

Orders

  • Extradition order affirmed under s.29 of the Extradition Act 1965
  • Appellant's discharge refused