Sienkiewicz v Wall [2018] IEHC 835 (08 November 2018)
Plaintiff's negligence in crossing the road at dusk, wearing dark clothing, at a bend without right of way, was the proximate cause of the accident. Defendant was driving within speed limit, with daylight running lights, and responded reasonably to emergency. No negligence or breach of duty established against...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 835
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Robert Sienkiewicz; Defendant: Noel Wall
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Pedestrian Safety, Motor Vehicle Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Sienkiewicz
Plaintiff
Noel Wall
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was negligent or breached duty in causing the collision
- 2 Whether the plaintiff contributed to the accident through his own negligence
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff's negligence in crossing the road at dusk, wearing dark clothing, at a bend without right of way, was the proximate cause of the accident. Defendant was driving within speed limit, with daylight running lights, and responded reasonably to emergency. No negligence or breach of duty established against defendant.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim against defendant is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment