Madigan v. Devally [1998] IEHC 58; [1999] 2 ILRM 141 (2nd April, 1998)
The applicant was not arrested under a section that conferred a power of arrest, nor under a section specified as a condition precedent for requiring a specimen. The statutory requirements for a lawful arrest and subsequent specimen requirement were not met. The conviction was therefore procedurally invalid and must...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] IEHC 58
- Parties
- Applicant: Rory Madigan; First Named Respondent: Judge Devally; Second Named Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Order of Certiorari granted; conviction quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Offences, Lawfulness of Arrest, Requirement for Specimen, Certiorari
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rory Madigan
Applicant
Judge Devally
First Named Respondent
Director of Public Prosecutions
Second Named Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was lawfully arrested under the relevant section of the Road Traffic Act
- 2 Whether the requirement to provide a blood specimen was lawful
- 3 Whether the conviction should be quashed for procedural impropriety
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was not arrested under a section that conferred a power of arrest, nor under a section specified as a condition precedent for requiring a specimen. The statutory requirements for a lawful arrest and subsequent specimen requirement were not met. The conviction was therefore procedurally invalid and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Order of Certiorari granted; conviction quashed.
Orders
- The order of the learned Circuit Judge is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment