Ryanair Ltd -v- Quigley [2015] IEHC 776 (09 December 2015)
Discovery was granted for categories of documents that are relevant and necessary to the pleaded issues and the defences of honest opinion and fair and reasonable publication, where the defendant has provided sufficient particulars or factual basis. Discovery was refused for categories where no supporting facts were pleaded or provided, as these amounted to a fishing exercise.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 776
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ryanair Ltd; Defendant: Ray Quigley
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
- Outcome
- Discovery granted in part and refused in part
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Honest Opinion Defence, Fair and Reasonable Publication, Pleadings, Relevance and Necessity of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ryanair Ltd
Plaintiff
Ray Quigley
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Application for Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is entitled to discovery of documents from the plaintiff in support of the defences of honest opinion and fair and reasonable publication under the Defamation Act 2009
- 2 Whether the categories of documents sought are relevant and necessary to the issues pleaded
Ratio Decidendi
Discovery was granted for categories of documents that are relevant and necessary to the pleaded issues and the defences of honest opinion and fair and reasonable publication, where the defendant has provided sufficient particulars or factual basis. Discovery was refused for categories where no supporting facts were pleaded or provided, as these amounted to a fishing exercise.
Court Disposition
Discovery granted in part and refused in part
Orders
- Discovery of airfield specific briefings to pilots for category B and C (Captain Only) airfields for the three years prior to 14 January 2012 (Category 2)
- Discovery of reports, communications, advice or warnings from aviation authorities or relevant bodies regarding air-safety at category B and C airfields for the same period (Category 3)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment