S.A.E. (Nigeria) -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal [2015] IEHC 815 (17 December 2015)
The Tribunal's decision was unsustainable as it was based on three adverse credibility findings, each of which was vitiated by material errors of fact and/or law. The cumulative credibility assessment was therefore fundamentally flawed, denying the applicant fair procedures.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 815
- Parties
- Applicant: S. A. E. (Nigeria); Respondents: Ben Garvey sitting as the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, The Office of the Refugee Application Commissioner, The Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Certiorari
- Outcome
- decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal quashed; certiorari granted
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Refugee Status Determination, Judicial Review, Credibility Assessment, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. A. E. (Nigeria)
Applicant
Ben Garvey sitting as the Refugee Appeals Tribunal, The Office of the Refugee Application Commissioner, The Minister for Justice and Equality, Ireland and Attorney General
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application for Certiorari
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Appeals Tribunal's decision was vitiated by errors of fact and law in its credibility findings
- 2 Whether the applicant was denied fair procedures in the assessment of his asylum claim
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision was unsustainable as it was based on three adverse credibility findings, each of which was vitiated by material errors of fact and/or law. The cumulative credibility assessment was therefore fundamentally flawed, denying the applicant fair procedures.
Court Disposition
decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal quashed; certiorari granted
Orders
- Order of certiorari quashing the Tribunal's decision
- Applicant's appeal to be considered by a different Tribunal member
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment