K. -v- Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Anor [2011] IEHC 301 (07 July 2011)
The Tribunal's negative credibility findings were not factually sustainable and breached established principles for credibility assessment, particularly by failing to rationally weigh country of origin information and by relying on misinterpreted inconsistencies. These errors amounted to an error of law, requiring...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] IEHC 301
- Parties
- Applicant: S. K.; Respondent: Refugee Appeals Tribunal; Respondent: Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- decision quashed and remitted
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Credibility Assessment, Judicial Review, Country of Origin Information
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. K.
Applicant
Refugee Appeals Tribunal
Respondent
Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Appeals Tribunal's negative credibility assessment was legally sustainable
- 2 Whether errors of fact amounted to an error of law justifying quashing the Tribunal's decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's negative credibility findings were not factually sustainable and breached established principles for credibility assessment, particularly by failing to rationally weigh country of origin information and by relying on misinterpreted inconsistencies. These errors amounted to an error of law, requiring the decision to be quashed.
Court Disposition
decision quashed and remitted
Orders
- The decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal is quashed.
- The matter is remitted to the Tribunal for re-hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment