Scafform Ltd v. G & T Crampton Ltd [1984] IEHC 99 (28 November 1984)

The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to payment as the work was completed in accordance with the contract and no valid defence was established by the defendant.

Citation: [1984] IEHC 99
Parties: Plaintiff: Scafform Ltd; Defendant: G & T Crampton Ltd
Jurisdiction: Ireland
Judgment Date: 28 November 1984
Procedural Posture: Civil / High Court Judgment
Outcome: judgment for the plaintiff
Legal Topics: Construction Contracts, Payment Disputes

Contract Law Construction Contracts Payment Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Scafform Ltd

Plaintiff

G & T Crampton Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff under the construction contract

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to payment as the work was completed in accordance with the contract and no valid defence was established by the defendant.

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

Defendant to pay the plaintiff the amount due under the contract