Lehany v. Loftus [2001] IEHC 108 (20th July, 2001)
The Court finds that the Applicant's proposed claim is statute barred under the Statute of Limitations, 1957, as the limitation period expired before leave was sought. Even if substantial grounds existed for contending lack of reasonable care or bad faith, leave is refused on the basis of statute bar.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] IEHC 108
- Parties
- Applicant: Seán Lehany; First Respondent: Dr. Declan Loftus; Second Respondent: Western Health Board
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Institute Civil Proceedings Under Mental Treatment Act, 1945 / High Court Judgment on Leave Application
- Outcome
- Leave to institute civil proceedings refused
- Legal Topics
- Statute of Limitations, Bad Faith, Reasonable Care, Detention Under Mental Treatment Act, Leave to Institute Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Seán Lehany
Applicant
Dr. Declan Loftus
First Respondent
Western Health Board
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Institute Civil Proceedings Under Mental Treatment Act, 1945 / High Court Judgment on Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether substantial grounds exist for contending that Respondents acted in bad faith or without reasonable care under Section 260 of the Mental Treatment Act, 1945
- 2 Whether the Applicant's proposed claim is statute barred under the Statute of Limitations, 1957
Ratio Decidendi
The Court finds that the Applicant's proposed claim is statute barred under the Statute of Limitations, 1957, as the limitation period expired before leave was sought. Even if substantial grounds existed for contending lack of reasonable care or bad faith, leave is refused on the basis of statute bar.
Court Disposition
Leave to institute civil proceedings refused
Orders
- Application for leave under Section 260 of the Mental Treatment Act, 1945 is refused
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment