O'Donnell v. Kilsaran Concrete Ltd. [2001] IEHC 155; [2002] 1 ILRM 551 (2nd November, 2001)

O'Donnell v. Kilsaran Concrete Ltd. [2001] IEHC 155; [2002] 1 ILRM 551 (2nd November, 2001)

The cause of action in contract accrued at the time of practical completion in 1988 and is time barred. The cause of action in tort accrued when actual damage (cracking due to iron pyrites) occurred, which was found to be of recent origin (1998), thus the tort claim is not time barred.

Citation
[2002] 1 ILRM 551
Parties
Plaintiffs: Plaintiffs; Defendant: Second Named Defendant; Defendant: First Named Defendant; Supplier (not a Direct Party): Spollen Concrete Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Trial of a Point of Law Prior to Trial / Preliminary Determination on Statute of Limitations
Outcome
Plaintiffs' claim in contract is time barred; Plaintiffs' claim in tort is not time barred.
Legal Topics
Statute of Limitations, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Latent Defects, Economic Loss
Contract Law Tort Law Civil Procedure Statute of Limitations Breach of Contract Negligence Latent Defects Economic Loss

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs

Second Named Defendant

Defendant

First Named Defendant

Defendant

Spollen Concrete Limited

Supplier (not a Direct Party)

Procedural Posture

Trial of a Point of Law Prior to Trial / Preliminary Determination on Statute of Limitations

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiffs' claims in contract and/or tort are time barred under the Statute of Limitations
  2. 2 When the cause of action accrued for the purposes of limitation in cases involving latent defects

Ratio Decidendi

The cause of action in contract accrued at the time of practical completion in 1988 and is time barred. The cause of action in tort accrued when actual damage (cracking due to iron pyrites) occurred, which was found to be of recent origin (1998), thus the tort claim is not time barred.

Court Disposition

Plaintiffs' claim in contract is time barred; Plaintiffs' claim in tort is not time barred.

Orders

  • The cause of action pleaded by the Plaintiffs in contract is time barred.
  • The cause of action against the Defendants or either of them pleaded in tort is not time barred.