Callery v. Sinnan Inns Ltd. t/a Clifton Court Hotel [2002] IEHC 111 (28 November 2002)
The court found that the evidence did not support the plaintiff's claim that his finger was bitten by security staff and that the force used was reasonable in the circumstances to restrain an aggressive individual. Therefore, the appellant was not liable for the plaintiff's injuries.
- Citation
- [2002] IEHC 111
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Thomas Callery; Defendant/appellant: Sinnan Inns Limited t/a Clifton Court Hotel; Defendant: Security Extra Services Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Circuit Court Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; Circuit Court judgment against appellant set aside
- Legal Topics
- Personal Injury, Negligence, Use of Reasonable Force, Vicarious Liability, Assault
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Callery
Plaintiff/respondent
Sinnan Inns Limited t/a Clifton Court Hotel
Defendant/appellant
Security Extra Services Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Circuit Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the force used by security staff was excessive and constituted assault or negligence
- 2 Whether the injury to the plaintiff's finger was caused by biting by security staff
- 3 Whether the appellant is liable for the acts of the security firm's employees
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the evidence did not support the plaintiff's claim that his finger was bitten by security staff and that the force used was reasonable in the circumstances to restrain an aggressive individual. Therefore, the appellant was not liable for the plaintiff's injuries.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; Circuit Court judgment against appellant set aside
Orders
- Order of the Circuit Court against Sinnan Inns Limited t/a Clifton Court Hotel set aside
- No order made regarding Security Extra Services Limited as they did not appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment