Kennedy v Harrahill [2013] IESC 26 (12 June 2013)
The appellant failed to demonstrate any breach of constitutional rights or fair procedures, did not meet the exceptional threshold required to set aside a Supreme Court order, and the mere assertion of lack of fair procedures is insufficient. The lis pendens must be discharged as the proceedings are no longer under appeal.
- Citation
- [2013] IESC 26
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Thomas Kennedy; Defendant/respondent: Owen Harrahill
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Motion to Set Aside Supreme Court Order and Motion to Discharge Lis Pendens / Post Final Order, Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appellant's motion refused; respondent's motion to discharge lis pendens allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Supreme Court Orders, Fair Procedures, Finality of Judgments, Lis Pendens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Kennedy
Plaintiff/appellant
Owen Harrahill
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion to Set Aside Supreme Court Order and Motion to Discharge Lis Pendens / Post Final Order, Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court should set aside its final order of 18 May 2012
- 2 Whether the appellant was denied fair procedures
- 3 Whether the lis pendens registered by the appellant should be discharged
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to demonstrate any breach of constitutional rights or fair procedures, did not meet the exceptional threshold required to set aside a Supreme Court order, and the mere assertion of lack of fair procedures is insufficient. The lis pendens must be discharged as the proceedings are no longer under appeal.
Court Disposition
Appellant's motion refused; respondent's motion to discharge lis pendens allowed.
Orders
- Order of Supreme Court of 18 May 2012 stands.
- Examiner of Titles directed to discharge lis pendens registered against Folio TY6265F County of Tipperary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment