Coffey -v- A Judge of the District Court & anor [2018] IEHC 62 (09 February 2018)
The District Judge acted within the law in refusing to grant a separate Legal Aid Certificate for the Garda Reilly Charges, as both sets of charges were before the court at the same time and already covered by an existing certificate. There was no legal authority to grant a second certificate in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 62
- Parties
- Applicant: Shane Coffey; First Respondent: A Judge of the District Court; Second Respondent: The Minister for Justice and Equality
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Legal Aid, Judicial Review, District Court Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shane Coffey
Applicant
A Judge of the District Court
First Respondent
The Minister for Justice and Equality
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Judge was required to grant a separate Legal Aid (District Court) Certificate for distinct prosecutions arising from different incidents and prosecutors.
- 2 Whether the refusal to grant a separate certificate was unreasonable, irrational, or contrary to statutory requirements.
Ratio Decidendi
The District Judge acted within the law in refusing to grant a separate Legal Aid Certificate for the Garda Reilly Charges, as both sets of charges were before the court at the same time and already covered by an existing certificate. There was no legal authority to grant a second certificate in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- Refusal to grant order of certiorari quashing the refusal to grant a separate Legal Aid Certificate for case no. 2015/76868.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment