Quinnsworth/Revoclife Ltd [1993] IECA 128 (13th October, 1993)

The Authority found that the lease and its restrictive clauses do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State.

Citation: [1993] IECA 128
Parties: Landlord: Quinnsworth; Tenant: Revoclife Ltd
Jurisdiction: Ireland
Procedural Posture: Competition Notification / Decision
Outcome: certificate issued
Legal Topics: Shopping Centre Lease, Restrictive Covenants, Exclusive User Clauses

Competition Law Shopping Centre Lease Restrictive Covenants Exclusive User Clauses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Quinnsworth

Landlord

Revoclife Ltd

Tenant

Procedural Posture

Competition Notification / Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the lease agreement between Quinnsworth and Revoclife Ltd contains clauses that prevent, restrict, or distort competition contrary to Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991

Ratio Decidendi

The Authority found that the lease and its restrictive clauses do not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting, or distorting competition in trade in any goods or services in the State.

Court Disposition

certificate issued

Orders

The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement between Quinnsworth and Revoclife Ltd does not offend against Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.