Silverstone Designs Ltd v. Ryan [2000] IEHC 22 (28th February, 2000)

Silverstone Designs Ltd v. Ryan [2000] IEHC 22 (28th February, 2000)

The court held that there were no special or unusual circumstances justifying review or amendment of the judgment, the draft order accurately reflected the decision pronounced, and there was no basis to state a case to the Supreme Court. The application was dismissed.

Citation
[2000] IEHC 22
Parties
Plaintiff: Silverstone Designs Ltd; Defendant: Niall Ryan
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Circuit Appeal / Post Judgment Application for Review and Case Stated
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Inherent Jurisdiction to Review Judgment, Finality of Judgments, Amendment of Court Orders, Case Stated Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Silverstone Designs Ltd

Plaintiff

Niall Ryan

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion in Circuit Appeal / Post Judgment Application for Review and Case Stated

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review its own judgment prior to perfection of the order
  2. 2 Whether special or unusual circumstances exist to justify amendment or review of the judgment
  3. 3 Whether a case should be stated to the Supreme Court after judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that there were no special or unusual circumstances justifying review or amendment of the judgment, the draft order accurately reflected the decision pronounced, and there was no basis to state a case to the Supreme Court. The application was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for review of judgment refused
  • Application to state a case to the Supreme Court refused