Silverstone Designs Ltd v. Ryan [2000] IEHC 22 (28th February, 2000)
The court held that there were no special or unusual circumstances justifying review or amendment of the judgment, the draft order accurately reflected the decision pronounced, and there was no basis to state a case to the Supreme Court. The application was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2000] IEHC 22
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Silverstone Designs Ltd; Defendant: Niall Ryan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Circuit Appeal / Post Judgment Application for Review and Case Stated
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Inherent Jurisdiction to Review Judgment, Finality of Judgments, Amendment of Court Orders, Case Stated Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silverstone Designs Ltd
Plaintiff
Niall Ryan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Circuit Appeal / Post Judgment Application for Review and Case Stated
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review its own judgment prior to perfection of the order
- 2 Whether special or unusual circumstances exist to justify amendment or review of the judgment
- 3 Whether a case should be stated to the Supreme Court after judgment
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that there were no special or unusual circumstances justifying review or amendment of the judgment, the draft order accurately reflected the decision pronounced, and there was no basis to state a case to the Supreme Court. The application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for review of judgment refused
- Application to state a case to the Supreme Court refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment