SJL & Anor -v- The Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors [2016] IECA 47 (26 February 2016)

SJL & Anor -v- The Refugee Appeals Tribunal & Ors [2016] IECA 47 (26 February 2016)

The applicants cannot be excluded from consideration as members of a particular social group solely because of the general application of the law they breached; the Tribunal's process was procedurally deficient in its credibility assessment and consideration of evidence, warranting remittal for fresh determination.

Citation
[2016] IECA 47
Parties
Applicant: SJL; Applicant: LRC; Appellant: Refugee Appeals Tribunal; Appellant: Minister for Justice and Equality; Appellant: Attorney General; Appellant: Ireland; Notice Party: Human Rights Commission
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
26 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Membership of a Particular Social Group, One Child Policy, Credibility Assessment, Country of Origin Information, Judicial Review, Refugee Convention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SJL

Applicant

LRC

Applicant

Refugee Appeals Tribunal

Appellant

Minister for Justice and Equality

Appellant

Attorney General

Appellant

Ireland

Appellant

Human Rights Commission

Notice Party

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Chinese nationals who breached the one child policy constitute a 'particular social group' under the Refugee Act 1996 and relevant EU/International law
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal's credibility findings and consideration of country of origin information were procedurally fair

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants cannot be excluded from consideration as members of a particular social group solely because of the general application of the law they breached; the Tribunal's process was procedurally deficient in its credibility assessment and consideration of evidence, warranting remittal for fresh determination.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Matter remitted to the Refugee Appeals Tribunal for fresh consideration of the applications in light of the court's findings.