SKS v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Anor (Approved) [2020] IEHC 560 (03 November 2020)
The reasons for the first Respondent's credibility findings are discernible and adequate; the assessment of documentary evidence was reasonable and not irrational; the internet search regarding the lawyer was not material to the decision.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 560
- Parties
- Applicant: SKS; First Respondent: The International Protection Appeals Tribunal; Second Respondent: The Minister for Justice and Equality
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- International Protection, Credibility Assessment, Duty to Give Reasons, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SKS
Applicant
The International Protection Appeals Tribunal
First Respondent
The Minister for Justice and Equality
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the first Respondent failed to give adequate reasons for its conclusions on credibility
- 2 Whether the first Respondent's assessment of documentary evidence was irrational or speculative
- 3 Whether an internet search conducted by the first Respondent regarding the Applicant's lawyer was unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The reasons for the first Respondent's credibility findings are discernible and adequate; the assessment of documentary evidence was reasonable and not irrational; the internet search regarding the lawyer was not material to the decision.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Order for costs in favour of the Respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment