Moram -v- Bell & Ors [2012] IEHC 111 (05 March 2012)
The claim is not justiciable as it concerns church discipline, is statute-barred for events before January 17, 2008, and fails for lack of publication to a third party and absence of special damage pleaded. The pleadings disclose no cause of action against the named defendants.
- Citation
- [2012] IEHC 111
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Ruth Moram; Defendant/respondent: Martyn Bell; Defendant/respondent: Peter Benthem; Defendant/respondent: Andrew Beeston
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Circuit Court to High Court
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Slander, Statute of Limitations, Justiciability, Church Discipline, Publication Requirement, Special Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ruth Moram
Plaintiff/applicant
Martyn Bell
Defendant/respondent
Peter Benthem
Defendant/respondent
Andrew Beeston
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Circuit Court to High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim for slander is justiciable before a secular court
- 2 Whether the claim is statute-barred under the Statute of Limitations
- 3 Whether there was publication to an identified third party
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is not justiciable as it concerns church discipline, is statute-barred for events before January 17, 2008, and fails for lack of publication to a third party and absence of special damage pleaded. The pleadings disclose no cause of action against the named defendants.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- Plaintiff's claim dismissed for want of cause of action.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment