Smeltzer v. Fingal County Council [1997] IEHC 223; [1998] 1 IR 279; [1998] 1 ILRM 25 (13th August, 1997)
No public trust or statutory right to use the park as a public park was created upon acquisition, but the Council's actions in laying out and opening the park and its pathways constituted a dedication of public rights of way, which cannot be extinguished except by compliance with statutory procedures under the Roads Act 1993.
- Citation
- [1997] IEHC 223
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Smeltzer; Defendant: Fingal County Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Plenary Summons / Trial at First Instance
- Outcome
- Injunction granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Public Rights of Way, Dedication of Land, Extinguishment of Public Rights, Statutory Powers of Local Authorities, Trusts in Public Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Smeltzer
Plaintiff
Fingal County Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Plenary Summons / Trial at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a public trust or statutory right exists over the Town Park land acquired by the Council
- 2 Whether public rights of way have been dedicated over the park pathways and the process for their extinguishment
Ratio Decidendi
No public trust or statutory right to use the park as a public park was created upon acquisition, but the Council's actions in laying out and opening the park and its pathways constituted a dedication of public rights of way, which cannot be extinguished except by compliance with statutory procedures under the Roads Act 1993.
Court Disposition
Injunction granted in part
Orders
- Defendants prohibited from carrying out the proposed development until statutory procedures for extinguishment of public rights of way have been complied with.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment